Can Code Evaluation Metrics Detect Code Plagiarism?
Source Code Plagiarism Detection (SCPD) plays an important role in maintaining fairness and academic integrity in software engineering education. Code Evaluation Metrics (CEMs) are developed for assessing code generation tasks. However, it remains unclear whether such metrics can reliably detect plagiarism across different levels of modification (L1-L6), increasing in complexity. In this paper, we perform a comparative empirical study using two open-source labelled datasets, ConPlag (raw and tem
Record details
Published: 28 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Copyright & IP · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Mathematical Modelling of Ethical AI Use in Higher Education: A Coordination Game Framework for Future-Facing Learning
arXiv · 23 April 2026
Brainrot: Deskilling and Addiction are Overlooked AI Risks
arXiv · 5 May 2026
Preparing Students for AI-Powered Materials Discovery: A Workflow-Aligned Framework for AI Literacy, Equity, and Scientific Judgment
arXiv · 10 May 2026
Uncertainty-aware Generative Learning Path Recommendation with Cognition-Adaptive Diffusion
arXiv · 16 April 2026
Context Matters: Auditing Gender Bias in T2I Generation through Risk-Tiered Use-Case Profiles
arXiv · 13 May 2026
Neural-Symbolic Knowledge Tracing: Injecting Educational Knowledge into Deep Learning for Responsible Learner Modelling
arXiv · 9 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 April 2026), “Can Code Evaluation Metrics Detect Code Plagiarism?,” evidence record 5252, https://ethics.ai/record/5252 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.