Consumer Attitudes Towards AI in Digital Health: A Mixed-Methods Survey in Australia
AI applications are increasingly being introduced into digital health. While technical performance has advanced rapidly, successful deployment mainly depends on consumer attitudes, especially to patient-facing applications. However, most existing research examines consumer attitudes towards healthcare AI at an abstract level rather than in response to concrete artefacts. We report a mixed-methods survey study in Australia (N=275) examining consumer readiness, acceptance, trust, and risk percepti
Record details
Published: 30 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Young people's perceptions and recommendations for conversational generative artificial intelligence in youth mental health
arXiv · 15 April 2026
Towards an automated AI-based framework for floor plan compliance checks for residential buildings
arXiv · 26 May 2026
A survey of clinicians on the use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology, dermatology, radiology and radiation oncology
OpenAlex · 4 March 2021
Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence–Based Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy in Primary Care
OpenAlex · 28 September 2018
Which professional (non-technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 38
OpenAlex · 4 May 2016
Effect of an interactive therapeutic robotic animal on engagement, mood states, agitation and psychotropic drug use in people with dementia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol
OpenAlex · 1 August 2015
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 April 2026), “Consumer Attitudes Towards AI in Digital Health: A Mixed-Methods Survey in Australia,” evidence record 5164, https://ethics.ai/record/5164 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.