Young people's perceptions and recommendations for conversational generative artificial intelligence in youth mental health
Conversational generative artificial intelligence agents (or genAI chatbots) could benefit youth mental health, yet young people's perspectives remain underexplored. We examined the Mental health Intelligence Agent (Mia), a genAI chatbot originally designed for professionals in Australian youth services. Following co-design, 32 young people participated in online workshops exploring their perceptions of genAI chatbots in youth mental health and to develop recommendations for reconceptualising Mi
Record details
Published: 15 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Effect of an interactive therapeutic robotic animal on engagement, mood states, agitation and psychotropic drug use in people with dementia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol
OpenAlex · 1 August 2015
A Framework for Longitudinal Health AI Agents
arXiv · 13 April 2026
DeepER-Med: Advancing Deep Evidence-Based Research in Medicine Through Agentic AI
arXiv · 16 April 2026
Governed Reasoning for Institutional AI
arXiv · 12 April 2026
Agent^2 RL-Bench: Can LLM Agents Engineer Agentic RL Post-Training?
arXiv · 12 April 2026
TrajOnco: a multi-agent framework for temporal reasoning over longitudinal EHR for multi-cancer early detection
arXiv · 12 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 April 2026), “Young people's perceptions and recommendations for conversational generative artificial intelligence in youth mental health,” evidence record 5851, https://ethics.ai/record/5851 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.