Weight Pruning Amplifies Bias: A Multi-Method Study of Compressed LLMs for Edge AI
Weight pruning is widely advocated for deploying Large Language Models on resource-constrained IoT and edge devices, yet its impact on model fairness remains poorly understood. We conduct a controlled empirical study of three instruction-tuned models (Gemma-2-9b-it, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct) across three pruning methods (Random, Magnitude, Wanda) at four sparsity levels (10-70%) on 12,148 BBQ bias benchmark items with 5 random seeds, totaling 2,368,860 inference records. O
Record details
Published: 2 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
EQUITRIAGE: A Fairness Audit of Gender Bias in LLM-Based Emergency Department Triage
arXiv · 5 May 2026
Two Wrongs, No Right: Auditing Social-Desirability Bias in LLM Annotators for Computational Social Science
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Dual-Metric Evaluation of Social Bias in Large Language Models: Evidence from an Underrepresented Nepali Cultural Context
arXiv · 8 March 2026
Quantization Undoes Alignment: Bias Emergence in Compressed LLMs Across Models and Precision Levels
arXiv · 2 May 2026
Breaking Safety at the Token Boundary: How BPE Tokenization Creates Exploitable Gaps in LLM Alignment
arXiv · 1 May 2026
Generative AI in Academic Writing: A Comparison of DeepSeek, Qwen, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and Gemma
OpenAlex · 30 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (2 May 2026), “Weight Pruning Amplifies Bias: A Multi-Method Study of Compressed LLMs for Edge AI,” evidence record 5085, https://ethics.ai/record/5085 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.