Generative AI in Academic Writing: A Comparison of DeepSeek, Qwen, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and Gemma
DeepSeek v3, developed in China, was released in December 2024, followed by Alibaba’s Qwen 2.5 Max in January 2025 and Qwen3 235B in April 2025. These free and open-source models offer significant potential for academic writing and content creation. This study evaluates their academic writing performance by comparing them with ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and Gemma. There is a critical gap in the literature concerning how extensively these tools can be utilized and their potential to generat
Record details
Published: 30 April 2026
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: unclassified
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
EQUITRIAGE: A Fairness Audit of Gender Bias in LLM-Based Emergency Department Triage
arXiv · 5 May 2026
The Shibboleth Effect: Auditing the Cross-Lingual Distributional Skew of Large Language Models
arXiv · 9 June 2026
Hallucinating with AI: Distributed Delusions and “AI Psychosis”
OpenAlex · 11 February 2026
Do language families matter? Evaluating LLMs for sentiment analysis through a hierarchical cross-lingual lens
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 24 July 2026
Performance of 5 Large Language Models in Perioperative Consultation for Pediatric Hypospadias: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 29 July 2026
Beyond Simulations: What 20,000 Real Conversations Reveal About Mental Health AI Safety
arXiv cs.CY · 5 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 April 2026), “Generative AI in Academic Writing: A Comparison of DeepSeek, Qwen, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and Gemma,” evidence record 9878, https://ethics.ai/record/9878 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.