CAMAL: Improving Attention Alignment and Faithfulness with Segmentation Masks
Many vision datasets now provide segmentation masks in addition to annotated images to support a wide range of tasks. In this work, we propose Class Activation Map Attention Learning (CAMAL), an efficient and scalable method that utilizes segmentation masks to improve attention alignment and faithfulness in vision models. Specifically, attention alignment refers to the degree to which a model's attention aligns with ground-truth discriminative regions, while attention faithfulness refers to the
Record details
Published: 8 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Quality-Conditioned Agreement in Automated Short Answer Scoring: Mid-Range Degradation and the Impact of Task-Specific Adaptation
arXiv · 8 May 2026
Strat-LLM: Stratified Strategy Alignment for LLM-based Stock Trading with Real-time Multi-Source Signals
arXiv · 7 May 2026
Resolving the bias-precision paradox with stochastic causal representation learning for personalized medicine
arXiv · 7 May 2026
Misaligned by Reward: Socially Undesirable Preferences in LLMs
arXiv · 6 May 2026
RLearner-LLM: Balancing Logical Grounding and Fluency in Large Language Models via Hybrid Direct Preference Optimization
arXiv · 6 May 2026
Brainrot: Deskilling and Addiction are Overlooked AI Risks
arXiv · 5 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (8 May 2026), “CAMAL: Improving Attention Alignment and Faithfulness with Segmentation Masks,” evidence record 4717, https://ethics.ai/record/4717 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.