Acceptance Cards:A Four-Diagnostic Standard for Safe Fine-Tuning Defense Claims
Safe fine-tuning defenses are often endorsed on the basis of a held-out gap reduction, but the same reduction can come from sampling noise, subject artifacts, capability loss, or a mechanism that does not transfer. We introduce Acceptance Cards: an evaluation protocol, a documentation object, an executable audit package, and a claim-specific evidential standard for safe fine-tuning defense claims. The protocol checks statistical reliability, fresh semantic generalization, mechanism alignment, an
Record details
Published: 11 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Healthcare · Military & security · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Open-Box Fallacy: Why AI Deployment Needs a Calibrated Verification Regime
arXiv · 11 May 2026
Fusion-fission forecasts when AI will shift to undesirable behavior
arXiv · 14 May 2026
Do Vision Models Truly Forget? New Findings from Representation-Level Certification of Visual Unlearning in Vertical Federated Learning
arXiv · 19 May 2026
SAM-Sode: Towards Faithful Explanations for Tiny Bacteria Detection
arXiv · 20 May 2026
NEURON: A Neuro-symbolic System for Grounded Clinical Explainability
arXiv · 2 May 2026
Uncertainty Reasoning with Large Language Models for Explainable Disease Diagnosis
arXiv · 25 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 May 2026), “Acceptance Cards:A Four-Diagnostic Standard for Safe Fine-Tuning Defense Claims,” evidence record 4553, https://ethics.ai/record/4553 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.