Evidence record 4551 · automatically gathered

Fairness vs Performance: Characterizing the Pareto Frontier of Algorithmic Decision Systems

Designing fair algorithmic decision systems requires balancing model performance with fairness toward affected individuals: More fairness might require sacrificing some performance and vice versa, yet the space of possible trade-offs is still poorly understood. We investigate fairness in binary prediction-based decision problems by conceptualizing decision making as a multi-objective optimization problem that simultaneously considers decision-maker utility and group fairness. We investigate the

Record details

Published: 11 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (11 May 2026), “Fairness vs Performance: Characterizing the Pareto Frontier of Algorithmic Decision Systems,” evidence record 4551, https://ethics.ai/record/4551 (originally published by arXiv).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.