SkiP: When to Skip and When to Refine for Efficient Robot Manipulation
Previous imitation learning policies predict future actions at every control step, whether in smooth motion phases or precise, contact-rich operation phases. This uniform treatment is wasteful: most steps in a manipulation trajectory traverse free space and carry little task-relevant information, while a small fraction of \emph{key} steps around contacts, grasps, and alignment demand dense, high-resolution prediction. We propose a novel \emph{action relabeling} mechanism: at each timestep in a s
Record details
Published: 15 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Ensemble Monitoring for AI Control: Diverse Signals Outweigh More Compute
arXiv · 14 May 2026
From I/O to Code with Discovery Agent
arXiv · 14 May 2026
Harnesses for Inference-Time Alignment over Execution Trajectories
arXiv · 15 May 2026
Body-Grounded Perspective Formation and Conative Attunement in Artificial Agents
arXiv · 16 May 2026
Beyond Binary: Reframing GUI Critique as Continuous Semantic Alignment
arXiv · 14 May 2026
ProtoMedAgent: Multimodal Clinical Interpretability via Privacy-Aware Agentic Workflows
arXiv · 13 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 May 2026), “SkiP: When to Skip and When to Refine for Efficient Robot Manipulation,” evidence record 4288, https://ethics.ai/record/4288 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.