Pluralistic-Alignment Urbanism: Operationalizing a Right to AI for Inclusive Public Space
Municipal agencies increasingly use machine learning to inventory sidewalks, score streetscapes, and generate visualizations of public-space interventions. These systems produce outputs that enter budgeting, design iteration, and public justification, yet judgments about inclusion, safety, and belonging remain contested. This paper proposes Pluralistic-Alignment Urbanism (PAU), a procedural governance framework that treats public-space AI systems as civic infrastructure and formulates a procedur
Record details
Published: 15 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Prompts for Public-Sector LLMs Should Be Governed as Commons
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Voices in the Loop: Mapping Participatory AI
arXiv · 16 May 2026
Position: Behavioural Assurance Cannot Verify the Safety Claims Governance Now Demands
arXiv · 14 May 2026
Ablating Safety: Mechanisms for Removing Alignment in Language Models for Security Applications
arXiv · 17 May 2026
REBAR: Reference Ethical Benchmark for Autonomy Readiness
arXiv · 18 May 2026
AMR-SD: Asymmetric Meta-Reflective Self-Distillation for Token-Level Credit Assignment
arXiv · 18 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 May 2026), “Pluralistic-Alignment Urbanism: Operationalizing a Right to AI for Inclusive Public Space,” evidence record 4243, https://ethics.ai/record/4243 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.