Voices in the Loop: Mapping Participatory AI
Participatory approaches to artificial intelligence are increasingly documented across public, civic, and humanitarian settings, but evidence about how participation is organized remains fragmented. This paper reports on the construction of an open repository and interactive atlas of participatory AI initiatives, using records harmonized from Maga~na and Shilton's Trustworthy AI corpus, and additional audited cases from research and practice. We contribute three elements. First, we specify a rep
Record details
Published: 16 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Benchmarks for Vision-Language Models in Urban Perception Should Be Reliability-Aware and Negotiated
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Pluralistic-Alignment Urbanism: Operationalizing a Right to AI for Inclusive Public Space
arXiv · 15 May 2026
Prompts for Public-Sector LLMs Should Be Governed as Commons
arXiv · 30 May 2026
AI Pluralism and the Worlds It Misses
arXiv · 15 June 2026
GPF-LiveNews: A Streaming Evaluation Protocol for Group-Conditioned Framing in Large Language Models
arXiv · 16 May 2026
Auditing Discriminatory Patterns in Mortgage Lending Through Association Rules and Fair Binning
arXiv · 16 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 May 2026), “Voices in the Loop: Mapping Participatory AI,” evidence record 4230, https://ethics.ai/record/4230 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.