Probing Stylistic Appropriation using Large Language Models: An Evaluation Framework for Copyright Infringement under EU Law
Large language models (LLM) trained on web-scale corpora generate output that may infringe copyright, yet existing technical safeguards focus narrowly on verbatim memorisation. EU copyright doctrine applies a broader standards: substantial similarity, which extends to stylistic choices, narrative structure, and creative elaboration. This mismatch between what current methods detect and what the law protects leaves a significant compliance gap. We introduce PSALM, an LLM-as-a-judge framework that
Record details
Published: 30 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Copyright & IP
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
From Licensing to Open Access: Designing a Sustainable Transition in Operational Weather Data
arXiv · 20 May 2026
GEMA vs. OpenAI | AI memorisation is a reproduction relevant to copyright law, and the TDM exception does not help in LLM training, Munich I Regional Court holds
AI Incident Database · 26 July 2026
AI and Doctrinal Collapse
Harvard Berkman Klein Center · 30 June 2026
TILDE: TILt-based Distributional Erasure for Concept Unlearning
arXiv · 7 July 2026
Revising research practices for singing data collection
AI & Society · 12 July 2026
Challenges to Grassroots Organization Engagement with AI Policy
arXiv · 18 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 June 2026), “Probing Stylistic Appropriation using Large Language Models: An Evaluation Framework for Copyright Infringement under EU Law,” evidence record 415, https://ethics.ai/record/415 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.