Modernizing User Privacy Preference Measurement through GPPI: A GDPR-aligned Privacy Preference Item Bank
Privacy measurement instruments (e.g., CFIP, IUIPC, PAQ) predate GDPR by over a decade and measure privacy concerns, distinct from preferences for regulatory protections (e.g., data portability, erasure, automated decision-making rights). This leaves practitioners without tools to assess whether users value the GDPR mechanisms implemented in compliant policies. We developed a GDPR-grounded privacy preference measurement item bank by extracting 669 statements from all 99 GDPR articles, validated
Record details
Published: 23 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Privacy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Local Privacy Laws in a Globalized World
arXiv · 27 May 2026
Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces
arXiv · 8 June 2026
The registrar's function in a hybrid society. AI value chain,smart data and the concept of property
arXiv · 27 June 2026
Operationalising the Right to be Forgotten in LLMs: A Lightweight Sequential Unlearning Framework for Privacy-Aligned Deployment in Politically Sensitive Environments
arXiv · 14 April 2026
Auditable Machine Unlearning for Privacy-Compliant Ransomware Detection Using Multi-Shard SISA and Deep Reinforcement Learning
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 7 July 2026
Do LLMs Fabricate Legal Citations? A Bilingual Benchmark on Saudi Data Protection Law and the GDPR
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 May 2026), “Modernizing User Privacy Preference Measurement through GPPI: A GDPR-aligned Privacy Preference Item Bank,” evidence record 3837, https://ethics.ai/record/3837 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.