Operationalising the Right to be Forgotten in LLMs: A Lightweight Sequential Unlearning Framework for Privacy-Aligned Deployment in Politically Sensitive Environments
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in politically sensitive environments, where memorisation of personal data or confidential content raises regulatory concerns under frameworks such as the GDPR and its Right to be Forgotten. Translating such legal principles into large-scale generative systems presents significant technical challenges. We introduce a lightweight sequential unlearning framework that explicitly separates retention and suppression objectives. The method first s
Record details
Published: 14 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Privacy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces
arXiv · 8 June 2026
Enabling Multilingual Privacy Policy Audits: Large-Scale Analysis of Spanish Mobile Apps
arXiv cs.CY · 22 July 2026
Governed Shared Memory for Multi-Agent LLM Systems
arXiv · 23 June 2026
WattCouncil: Context-Aware Household Energy Scenario Generation With Governed LLMs
arXiv · 12 July 2026
AI Agents for Sustainable SMEs: A Green ESG Assessment Framework
arXiv · 5 April 2026
AEGIS: An Operational Infrastructure for Post-Market Governance of Adaptive Medical AI Under US and EU Regulations
arXiv · 20 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 April 2026), “Operationalising the Right to be Forgotten in LLMs: A Lightweight Sequential Unlearning Framework for Privacy-Aligned Deployment in Politically Sensitive Environments,” evidence record 5884, https://ethics.ai/record/5884 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.