Who judges the judges? Governance from metrics: a runtime framework for continuous LLM compliance monitoring
Current approaches to AI compliance treat conformity as a binary, audit-time verdict rather than a continuous, measurable property of production systems. We argue that this compliance fiction is structurally ill-suited to the requirements of the EU AI Act, which demands ongoing human oversight and the detection of emergent behavioural drift in deployed systems. We introduce governance from metrics, a principle whereby regulatory compliance is derived as a continuous signal from runtime observabi
Record details
Published: 23 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Native Explainability for Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Networks: A Framework for Trusted Brain-Like AI
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces
arXiv · 8 June 2026
Governing What the EU AI Act Excludes: Accountability for Autonomous AI Agents in Smart City Critical Infrastructure
arXiv · 1 May 2026
How Supply Chain Dependencies Complicate Bias Measurement and Accountability Attribution in AI Hiring Applications
arXiv · 24 April 2026
From Reactive to Proactive: A Multi-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of 480 AI Incidents and a Data-Driven Governance Compliance Framework
arXiv · 10 April 2026
Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation
HKS Misinformation Review · 7 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 May 2026), “Who judges the judges? Governance from metrics: a runtime framework for continuous LLM compliance monitoring,” evidence record 3801, https://ethics.ai/record/3801 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.