SEFORA: Student Essays with Feedback Corpus and LLM Feedback Evaluation Framework
Effective writing feedback is among the strongest drivers of student learning, yet producing it at scale is labor-intensive. LLMs offer a natural path to scaling writing support, but two gaps stand in the way: few public corpora capture how instructors actually deliver feedback in real classrooms, and no reliable method measures whether generated feedback aligns with what an instructor would write. We address both. SEFORA is a public corpus pairing instructor inline feedback with assignment prom
Record details
Published: 30 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Negotiating creator identity: agency and ethical awareness in AI-assisted art education
AI & Society · 29 June 2026
Bridging Technical AI, Societal Impacts, and Workforce Competencies in AI Education
arXiv · 19 June 2026
From Chaos to Clarity: A Framework for Program-Level AI Learning Outcomes
arXiv cs.HC · 13 July 2026
Open Veins of Algorithmic Auditing: Why AI Assessment Lags Behind Its Deployment in the Global South
arXiv · 23 July 2026
Impacts of Histories and Models on LLM Grading: A Study in Advanced Software Engineering Courses
arXiv · 7 June 2026
(Im)Paired Programming: Coding Agents Improve Productivity but Harm Understanding
arXiv cs.HC · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 June 2026), “SEFORA: Student Essays with Feedback Corpus and LLM Feedback Evaluation Framework,” evidence record 374, https://ethics.ai/record/374 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.