Rethinking Memory as Continuously Evolving Connectivity
Existing memory-augmented LLM agents often treat memory as a static repository with pre-defined representations and fixed retrieval pipelines, which is brittle in dynamic agentic environments where feedback, task variation, and heterogeneous signals continuously reshape what should be remembered and how it should be connected. To address this, we propose FluxMem, a connectivity-evolving memory framework that models memory as a heterogeneous graph and progressively refines its topology through th
Record details
Published: 27 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Calibrating Conservatism for Scalable Oversight
arXiv · 27 May 2026
How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions
arXiv · 28 May 2026
EgoBench: An Interactive Egocentric Multimodal Benchmark for Tool-Using Agents
arXiv · 27 May 2026
AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security
arXiv · 28 May 2026
Ultra-Reduced-Impact-Encased-Logging (URIEL): propose a new method for selective sustainable logging and post-harvest silvicultural treatment in tropical forest using airborne robotics systems
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems
arXiv · 26 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 May 2026), “Rethinking Memory as Continuously Evolving Connectivity,” evidence record 3567, https://ethics.ai/record/3567 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.