Brain alignment of reasoning and action representations from vision-language and action models during naturalistic gameplay
Understanding how humans and artificial intelligence systems predict and plan by interacting with their environment is a fundamental challenge at the intersection of neuroscience and machine learning. Most brain-encoding studies focus on aligning artificial models with brain activity during language comprehension or passive visual processing, while interactive brain-alignment studies have to date been largely limited to reinforcement-learning (RL) agents and theory-based models. To address this
Record details
Published: 19 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models
arXiv · 20 May 2026
Infra-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Agents Outperform Classical RL For Worst-Case Robustness
arXiv · 22 May 2026
No More, No Less: Task Alignment in Terminal Agents
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Position: AI Safety Requires Effective Controllability
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems
arXiv · 26 May 2026
How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions
arXiv · 28 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (19 May 2026), “Brain alignment of reasoning and action representations from vision-language and action models during naturalistic gameplay,” evidence record 4053, https://ethics.ai/record/4053 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.