TadA-Bench: A Million-Variant Benchmark for Future-Round Discovery Toward Agentic Protein Engineering
AI for scientific discovery is entering an agentic era, where protein-engineering systems are expected to prioritize future wet-lab experiments rather than merely fit static measurements. We introduce TadA-Bench, a million-variant wet-lab replay benchmark from 31 TadA directed-evolution rounds for future-round discovery toward agentic protein engineering. TadA-Bench preserves the campaign chronology and defines a fixed-data replay task: given earlier experimental rounds, models rank variants tha
Record details
Published: 29 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Biotech
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AOP-Wiki EMOD 3.0: Data Model Expansions and Content Evaluation Framework for Using Agentic AI to Improve Integration between AOPs and New Approach Methodologies (NAMs)
arXiv · 20 May 2026
Quantitative Promise Theory: Intentionality and Inference in Autonomous Agents
arXiv · 7 June 2026
GGBound: A Genome-Grounded Agent for Microbial Life-Boundary Prediction
arXiv · 14 May 2026
AssayBench: An Assay-Level Virtual Cell Benchmark for LLMs and Agents
arXiv · 11 May 2026
Machine Psychometrics: A Mathematical Psychology of Artificial Intelligence
arXiv · 10 May 2026
A Collective Variational Principle Unifying Bayesian Inference, Game Theory, and Thermodynamics
arXiv · 30 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 May 2026), “TadA-Bench: A Million-Variant Benchmark for Future-Round Discovery Toward Agentic Protein Engineering,” evidence record 3434, https://ethics.ai/record/3434 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.