Machine Psychometrics: A Mathematical Psychology of Artificial Intelligence
Artificial agents now generate behavior rich enough to invite trust, surprise, and concern, yet our evaluation tools still privilege capability scores over psychological structure. This paper argues that the philosophical impasse between two symmetrical errors (Artificial Mind Blindness, which dismisses psychological organization in non-biological systems, and Artificial Mind Projection, which infers human-like inner life from fluent behavior alone) can be circumvented not by resolving the consc
Record details
Published: 10 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Biotech
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AssayBench: An Assay-Level Virtual Cell Benchmark for LLMs and Agents
arXiv · 11 May 2026
GGBound: A Genome-Grounded Agent for Microbial Life-Boundary Prediction
arXiv · 14 May 2026
AOP-Wiki EMOD 3.0: Data Model Expansions and Content Evaluation Framework for Using Agentic AI to Improve Integration between AOPs and New Approach Methodologies (NAMs)
arXiv · 20 May 2026
A Collective Variational Principle Unifying Bayesian Inference, Game Theory, and Thermodynamics
arXiv · 30 April 2026
Agentic AI platforms for autonomous training and rule induction of human-human and virus-human protein-protein interactions
arXiv · 27 April 2026
FSFM: A Biologically-Inspired Framework for Selective Forgetting of Agent Memory
arXiv · 22 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 May 2026), “Machine Psychometrics: A Mathematical Psychology of Artificial Intelligence,” evidence record 4608, https://ethics.ai/record/4608 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.