Fairness Definitions and Metrics in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Drug Discovery in Healthcare: A Rapid Evidence Review
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is increasingly applied to de novo molecular design, but choices in data, rewards, and evaluation can yield uneven performance across disease areas and chemotypes. Despite this, there is no concise synthesis of how fairness is defined, measured, and tested in DRL-based drug discovery. In this rapid evidence review, we synthesize fairness definitions and metrics for DRL-driven molecule generation in healthcare. We focus on three questions: (i) how dataset composi
Record details
Published: 1 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare · Biotech
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Constance Viehbeck
LSE Data Science Institute · 6 July 2026
Ethics journal retracts paper by high school student for AI, peer review manipulation
Retraction Watch · 6 July 2026
TriEval: A Resource-Efficient Pipeline for LLM Bias, Toxicity, and Truthfulness Assessment
arXiv · 2 June 2026
Unsupervised Pattern Analysis in Japanese Veterinary Toxicology: A Regulatory-Compliant Framework for Cross-Species Risk Assessment
arXiv · 4 June 2026
Genetically Aligned Patient Representations Improve Hematological Diagnosis
arXiv · 28 May 2026
Testing the Black Box: Structural Barriers to Independent Evaluation of Consumer-Facing Health LLMs
arXiv · 7 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 June 2026), “Fairness Definitions and Metrics in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Drug Discovery in Healthcare: A Rapid Evidence Review,” evidence record 3262, https://ethics.ai/record/3262 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.