From Battlefield to Boardroom: Strategic Red Teaming as an Epistemic Governance Instrument in the Age of AI
Organizations increasingly make strategic decisions about AI systems whose behaviour, failure modes, and institutional effects cannot be fully known at design time. This technical report reframes strategic red teaming as a board-level governance discipline for testing the assumptions under which AI-enabled strategies are approved, funded, and supervised. The report proposes a six-component model for strategic red teaming in AI governance: an explicit assumption register, an adversarial mandate,
Record details
Published: 2 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Adversarial Pragmatics for AI Safety Evaluation: A Benchmark for Instruction Conflict, Embedded Commands, and Policy Ambiguity
arXiv · 1 July 2026
ACPO: Adaptive Credit Policy Optimization via Fine-Grained Surrogate Entropy
arXiv · 3 July 2026
When Aggregate Alignment Misleads: Auditing Policy Repair Without Per-State Expert Actions
arXiv · 3 July 2026
Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Traffic Signal Control
arXiv · 4 July 2026
Do Vision-Language-Action Models Mean What They Say? On the Role of Faithfulness in Embodied Reasoning
arXiv · 6 July 2026
Turning Off-Policy Tokens On-Policy: A Plug-in Approach for Improving LLM Alignment
arXiv · 6 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (2 July 2026), “From Battlefield to Boardroom: Strategic Red Teaming as an Epistemic Governance Instrument in the Age of AI,” evidence record 326, https://ethics.ai/record/326 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.