Efficient Waste Sorting for Circular Economy: A Confidence-guided comparison between One-Vs-All and One-Vs-Rest Classification Strategies with Human-in-the-Loop for Automated Waste Sorting
The complexity of waste disposal regulations across European countries poses significant challenges for the residents and hinders the transition to a Circular Economy. In Germany, the proper sorting and disposal of household waste remains challenging across municipalities. Consequently, substantially reducing incorrectly disposed waste is vital for improving waste management and advancing the Circular Economy. AI-based waste sorting solutions can support residents through user-friendly tools, su
Record details
Published: 2 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Human Utility Factor: A Computable Welfare Metric That Reframes AI Governance as a Constrained Optimisation Problem
arXiv cs.CY · 30 July 2026
AI Agents for Sustainable SMEs: A Green ESG Assessment Framework
arXiv · 5 April 2026
Regulating AI Agents
arXiv · 24 March 2026
Call for Tenders: European Data Market Study 2027–2028
European Commission · 30 June 2026
Tracking the evolution of case law with main path analysis
Artificial Intelligence and Law · 1 July 2026
Agentic AI and Retrieval-Augmented Models in Straight-Through Underwriting
arXiv · 8 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (2 July 2026), “Efficient Waste Sorting for Circular Economy: A Confidence-guided comparison between One-Vs-All and One-Vs-Rest Classification Strategies with Human-in-the-Loop for Automated Waste Sorting,” evidence record 311, https://ethics.ai/record/311 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.