Regulating AI Agents
AI agents -- systems that can independently take actions to pursue complex goals with only limited human oversight -- have entered the mainstream. These systems are now being widely used to produce software, conduct business activities, and automate everyday personal tasks. While AI agents implicate many areas of law, ranging from agency law and contracts to tort liability and labor law, they present particularly pressing questions for the most globally consequential AI regulation: the European
Record details
Published: 24 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Jobs & economy · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AI Agents for Sustainable SMEs: A Green ESG Assessment Framework
arXiv · 5 April 2026
HR-Agents: Using Multiple LLM-based Agents to Improve Q&A about Brazilian Labor Legislation
arXiv · 13 March 2026
The Biggest Risk of Embodied AI is Governance Lag
arXiv · 7 April 2026
Real-Time AI Service Economy: A Framework for Agentic Computing Across the Continuum
arXiv · 5 March 2026
ClawNet: Human-Symbiotic Agent Network for Cross-User Autonomous Cooperation
arXiv · 21 April 2026
An Empirical Study of Agent Skills for Healthcare: Practice, Gaps, and Governance
arXiv · 4 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (24 March 2026), “Regulating AI Agents,” evidence record 6797, https://ethics.ai/record/6797 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.