FairSelect: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Level and Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness
Algorithmic fairness methods are increasingly used to identify and mitigate bias in machine learning models, yet most approaches are evaluated in isolation and along single demographic axes. This limits practical guidance for selecting fairness strategies, where disparities may arise across intersectional subgroups and across multiple stages of the modeling lifecycle. This work presents FairSelect, a toolkit for systematically evaluating fairness mitigation strategies applied individually and in
Record details
Published: 9 July 2026
Source: arXiv fairness query
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Quota Marketplace: Dynamic Pricing for Efficient Allocation of ML Training Resources
arXiv fairness query · 9 July 2026
Compete Then Collaborate: Frontier AI Teachers Build a Verifiable Curriculum to Improve a Coding Student Beyond Imitation
arXiv · 9 July 2026
What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detection
arXiv · 10 July 2026
Optimizing ARDL Models for Retail Sales Forecasting and Fair Pricing
arXiv fairness query · 10 July 2026
Balancing fairness and influence spread in social networks: a multi-objective evolutionary approach
Artificial Intelligence Review · 11 July 2026
False Confidence: Automated Labels Confound Fairness Audits in Cervical Spine Segmentation
arXiv · 8 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 July 2026), “FairSelect: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Level and Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness,” evidence record 3048, https://ethics.ai/record/3048 (originally published by arXiv fairness query).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.