Balancing fairness and influence spread in social networks: a multi-objective evolutionary approach
Influence maximization in social networks has received increasing attention, particularly in applications where fairness among demographic groups is an important concern. However, many existing approaches either overlook group-level disparities or primarily optimize influence spread without explicitly modeling fairness-related trade-offs. In this paper, we propose a group-aware multi-objective evolutionary framework that decomposes seed sets into group-specific sub-solutions. Each demographic gr
Record details
Published: 11 July 2026
Source: Artificial Intelligence Review
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Optimizing ARDL Models for Retail Sales Forecasting and Fair Pricing
arXiv fairness query · 10 July 2026
What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detection
arXiv · 10 July 2026
Mitigating LLM Sycophancy in Code Smell Detection Using Evidence-Guided Reasoning Prompts
arXiv · 11 July 2026
How Data Narratives Go Wrong: A Taxonomy of Issues Across the Data Communication Process
arXiv cs.HC · 12 July 2026
FairSelect: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Level and Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness
arXiv fairness query · 9 July 2026
Quota Marketplace: Dynamic Pricing for Efficient Allocation of ML Training Resources
arXiv fairness query · 9 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 July 2026), “Balancing fairness and influence spread in social networks: a multi-objective evolutionary approach,” evidence record 1979, https://ethics.ai/record/1979 (originally published by Artificial Intelligence Review).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.