Toward Contemplative LLM: A Modular Framework for Evaluating and Enhancing LLM Alignment in Mental Health
Contemplative traditions have long guided ethical behavior and prosocial interaction, and recent work suggests that contemplative principles (e.g., mindfulness, compassion, non-dual reasoning) may offer a promising paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs), improving cooperation and reducing ethical violations in LLM outputs. However, as new models, evaluation metrics, and benchmarks emerge rapidly, it remains challenging to systematically assess whether and how contemplative principles
Record details
Published: 12 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Hybrid Large Language Models for Postoperative Decision Support: Comparative Analysis
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 14 July 2026
Interpretable polyp classification via end-to-end Concept Bottleneck Models with vision-language concept alignment
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 10 July 2026
NeuroGRIP: Retrieval-Augmented Graph Refinement for Knowledge-Grounded EEG Seizure Diagnosis
arXiv cs.LG · 15 July 2026
MedFailBench: A Clinician-Built Open-Source Benchmark for Medical AI Safety Boundary Inspection
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Mechanistic Interpretability of LLM Jailbreaks via Internal Attribution Graphs
arXiv · 8 July 2026
Self-Evolving Human-Centered Framework for Explainable Depression Symptom Annotation
arXiv cs.HC · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 July 2026), “Toward Contemplative LLM: A Modular Framework for Evaluating and Enhancing LLM Alignment in Mental Health,” evidence record 29, https://ethics.ai/record/29 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.