Interpretable polyp classification via end-to-end Concept Bottleneck Models with vision-language concept alignment
Background and objectiveArtificial intelligence has improved adenoma detection during colonoscopy, but most models remain black boxes, limiting clinical trust, especially for sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) route predictions through human-understandable concepts. We propose an end-to-end CBM for colonoscopic polyp classification with concept-level explanations aligned with clinical standards.MethodsWe defined 62 concepts from NBI International Colorectal Endosco
Record details
Published: 10 July 2026
Source: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Mechanistic Interpretability of LLM Jailbreaks via Internal Attribution Graphs
arXiv · 8 July 2026
Alignment Plausibility: A New Standard for Assuring AI in Healthcare
arXiv · 8 July 2026
X-FEMR: A Token-level Explainable Approach for Electronic Health Records Foundation Models using Transformer-based Models
arXiv · 7 July 2026
Toward Contemplative LLM: A Modular Framework for Evaluating and Enhancing LLM Alignment in Mental Health
arXiv · 12 July 2026
Retroactive Chain-of-Thought (RetroCoT): Forensic Reconstruction Prompts as a Safety Diagnostic Across Model Generations
arXiv · 6 July 2026
Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Hybrid Large Language Models for Postoperative Decision Support: Comparative Analysis
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 July 2026), “Interpretable polyp classification via end-to-end Concept Bottleneck Models with vision-language concept alignment,” evidence record 2221, https://ethics.ai/record/2221 (originally published by Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.