Security governance in UK telecoms: Reverse salience, path dependency and the paradox of stability vs innovation
Publication date: August 2026 Source: Telecommunications Policy, Volume 50, Issue 7 Author(s): Liam John Mcphee, Sajjad Bagheri Baba Ahmadi
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Telecommunications Policy
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Recent developments in the patentability of software in the UK
Computer Law and Security Review · 14 July 2026
IT law in the UK: Looking back on 2007 and ahead to 2009
Computer Law and Security Review · 14 July 2026
SCITUS: A Multi-Jurisdictional Framework for Adapting NIST AI RMF to the Canadian Regulatory Context
arXiv · 16 July 2026
UCL joins new Defence Universities Alliance
UCL Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation · 12 July 2026
SCITUS: A Multi-Jurisdictional Framework for Adapting NIST AI RMF to the Canadian Regulatory Context
arXiv cs.CY · 17 July 2026
How Analysts Use AI in High-Stakes Crime Linkage: An Industrial Study
arXiv cs.HC · 9 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Security governance in UK telecoms: Reverse salience, path dependency and the paradox of stability vs innovation,” evidence record 2120, https://ethics.ai/record/2120 (originally published by Telecommunications Policy).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.