SCITUS: A Multi-Jurisdictional Framework for Adapting NIST AI RMF to the Canadian Regulatory Context
arXiv:2607.15051v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Canadian organizations deploying artificial intelligence systems face a fragmented regulatory landscape spanning federal requirements (the Treasury Board Directive on Automated Decision-Making) and divergent provincial regulations across Ontario, Quebec, Alberta, Manitoba, and British Columbia. The death of Bill C-27 (Artificial Intelligence and Data Act) in January 2025 - and the federal government's June 2026 confirmation that it will pursue targ
Record details
Published: 17 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 17 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SCITUS: A Multi-Jurisdictional Framework for Adapting NIST AI RMF to the Canadian Regulatory Context
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Analysis of Public Attitudes on Facebook and Twitter Toward COVID-19 Vaccines in the United Kingdom and the United States: Observational Study
OpenAlex · 31 January 2021
Senator calls on Rubio, Blanche to push back against Canadian surveillance legislation
The Record (Recorded Future News) · 16 July 2026
The most important thing about the big new federal housing law
Vox Future Perfect · 18 July 2026
Upcoming Speaking Engagements
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 14 July 2026
Is Washington Rewriting the North American Trade Agreement Around China?
War on the Rocks · 4 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 July 2026), “SCITUS: A Multi-Jurisdictional Framework for Adapting NIST AI RMF to the Canadian Regulatory Context,” evidence record 10977, https://ethics.ai/record/10977 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.