Transparency, neutrality, voice, and respect: How procedural fairness considerations affect AI acceptability in algorithmic societies
Publication date: August 2026 Source: Technology in Society, Volume 87 Author(s): Pedro C. Magalhães, Sveinung Arnesen, Christoph Kern, Pascal D. Koenig, Daniel S. Schiff, Tom R. Tyler
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Technology in Society
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Enhancing fairness and transparency in student project evaluation: A spherical fuzzy alternative prioritization and assessment system-based decision support
Technology in Society · 14 July 2026
"Trust Junk" Leads to Unjustified Support for Highly Discriminatory Predictive Models
arXiv cs.HC · 14 July 2026
Demographically-Conditioned Synthetic Medical Images for Bias Mitigation and Bias Detection in Disease Classifiers
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Grokipedia vs Wikipedia: An LLM-Based Audit of Political Neutrality along Ideologies
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Logic, Optimization, and Artificial Intelligence
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Grokipedia vs Wikipedia: An LLM-Based Audit of Political Neutrality along Ideologies
arXiv cs.CY · 17 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Transparency, neutrality, voice, and respect: How procedural fairness considerations affect AI acceptability in algorithmic societies,” evidence record 2091, https://ethics.ai/record/2091 (originally published by Technology in Society).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.