Evidence record 1969 · automatically gathered

Autopoietic Bodily Integrity: A Biological Approach to Hybrid Minds

Recent cases of forced explantation of neurotechnologies seem to be grounded on a pre-theoretical naturalist conception of the body as an entity that cannot have a non-biological object as a proper part. However, this conception has been challenged by functional approaches, according to which if an artifact robustly contributes to the function of a body, it is part of it and should be legally treated as such. Bublitz ( 2022 ) argues that a series of problems would result from revising the law to

Record details

Published: 8 July 2026
Source: Minds and Machines
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Biotech
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (8 July 2026), “Autopoietic Bodily Integrity: A Biological Approach to Hybrid Minds,” evidence record 1969, https://ethics.ai/record/1969 (originally published by Minds and Machines).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.