{
  "id": 1969,
  "url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-026-09792-x",
  "title": "Autopoietic Bodily Integrity: A Biological Approach to Hybrid Minds",
  "summary": "Recent cases of forced explantation of neurotechnologies seem to be grounded on a pre-theoretical naturalist conception of the body as an entity that cannot have a non-biological object as a proper part. However, this conception has been challenged by functional approaches, according to which if an artifact robustly contributes to the function of a body, it is part of it and should be legally treated as such. Bublitz ( 2022 ) argues that a series of problems would result from revising the law to",
  "authors": null,
  "category": "research",
  "topics": "regulation,biotech",
  "orgs": null,
  "regions": null,
  "published_at": "2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z",
  "fetched_at": "2026-07-14T16:11:46.979Z",
  "source_slug": "x-minds-and-machines",
  "source_name": "Minds and Machines",
  "source_homepage": "https://link.springer.com/journal/11023",
  "ethics_ai_record_url": "https://ethics.ai/record/1969",
  "original_url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-026-09792-x",
  "evidence_status": "source-only",
  "attribution": "via ethics.ai"
}