From Local Mismatch to Global Impact: Optimizing Cache Reuse Policy for Efficient Diffusion
Diffusion models have achieved dominant performance in visual generation but suffer from substantial inference overhead. While cache-based acceleration has emerged as a promising solution, existing policies rely on local similarity heuristics, which we identify as being significantly misaligned with final generation quality. This discrepancy stems from the non-uniform propagation and accumulation of errors along the denoising trajectory. To address this, we propose Global-Impact Cache (GCache).
Record details
Published: 13 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Why Do AI Agents Break Rules? How Framing, Context, and Social Signals Shape Compliance
arXiv cs.CY · 14 August 2026
AI Guardrail Survival under Single-Cycle Agentic Self-Summarization
arXiv · 11 August 2026
SafeCA: Safe Cross-Attention Localization and Regulation for Text-to-Video Jailbreak Defense
arXiv red teaming query · 11 August 2026
SafeCap: Improving LVLM Safety with Image Captioning Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Measuring the Wrong Thing: Internal Harmfulness Scores Anti-Rank Successful Jailbreaks
arXiv cs.AI · 10 August 2026
Faithful or evasive? An empirical study on translation norm preferences of Chinese and American LLMs in Chinese official political and policy discourse
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 August 2026), “From Local Mismatch to Global Impact: Optimizing Cache Reuse Policy for Efficient Diffusion,” evidence record 19184, https://ethics.ai/record/19184 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.