Too human to trust? How warmth, competence, and anxiety shape employee avoidance of generative AI
As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) becomes increasingly embedded in organizational innovation and digital transformation strategies, understanding its implications for workforce adaptation has emerged as a critical managerial and strategic issue. This study examines how employees’ perceptions of GenAI, specifically perceived competence and perceived warmth, together with information overload, relate to AI anxiety and subsequent avoidance behavior in the workplace. Drawing on technostr
Record details
Published: 12 August 2026
Source: AI & Society
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Digital decoupling: educational stratification and dual-track effects of AI displacement and augmentation in U.S. occupations
AI & Society · 12 August 2026
Creative labour and generative AI: a typology of asymmetrical relations
AI & Society · 12 August 2026
AI, material agency, and architecture’s crisis
AI & Society · 12 August 2026
Behind the “AI slop”: exploring the AI-generated viral short video production in China
AI & Society · 12 August 2026
Authorship After Generative AI: Distributed Creativity and Relational Responsibility
Philosophy & Technology · 12 August 2026
Cheap, Fallible Cognition and the Political Economy of Expertise
arXiv · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 August 2026), “Too human to trust? How warmth, competence, and anxiety shape employee avoidance of generative AI,” evidence record 18848, https://ethics.ai/record/18848 (originally published by AI & Society).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.