Evidence record 18806 · automatically gathered

The Accuracy Trap: Structural Scarcity Amplifies Relative Inequality in Algorithmic Allocation

Algorithmic systems increasingly rank individuals for access to scarce public resources, from child welfare interventions to cancer treatment referrals. The prevailing fairness frame treats disparity as a property of biased data or deficient models, with remedies through calibration and debiasing. Under structural scarcity, where demand exceeds supply by an order of magnitude, allocation becomes a rationing problem, and the statistical properties of ranking diverge sharply from those of classifi

Record details

Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Children & education
Retrieved: 13 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “The Accuracy Trap: Structural Scarcity Amplifies Relative Inequality in Algorithmic Allocation,” evidence record 18806, https://ethics.ai/record/18806 (originally published by arXiv).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.