The Accuracy Trap: Structural Scarcity Amplifies Relative Inequality in Algorithmic Allocation
Algorithmic systems increasingly rank individuals for access to scarce public resources, from child welfare interventions to cancer treatment referrals. The prevailing fairness frame treats disparity as a property of biased data or deficient models, with remedies through calibration and debiasing. Under structural scarcity, where demand exceeds supply by an order of magnitude, allocation becomes a rationing problem, and the statistical properties of ranking diverge sharply from those of classifi
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Children & education
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Accuracy Trap: Structural Scarcity Amplifies Relative Inequality in Algorithmic Allocation
arXiv cs.CY · 13 August 2026
Two-Phase Simulated Annealing for Equitable Team Formation: Eliminating Complaints in Large Engineering Cohorts
arXiv cs.CY · 12 August 2026
Neuro-symbolic pedagogical alignment (NSPA) for long-horizon classroom discourse analysis: Mitigating dialect bias via counterfactual preference optimization
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 12 August 2026
Privileged, but Biased: How PI-Conditioned Teachers Break Self-Distillation
arXiv cs.AI · 5 August 2026
Comparative Validation of GPT-4o-mini and Teacher Mean Scores for Automated Scoring of Music Analysis Responses: Single-Pass Deployment, Repeatability, and Strategy-Specific Bias
arXiv cs.HC · 3 August 2026
Rethinking Generative AI Literacy: An Integrative, Developmental, and Dialectical Framework for K-12 Teacher Education
arXiv · 3 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “The Accuracy Trap: Structural Scarcity Amplifies Relative Inequality in Algorithmic Allocation,” evidence record 18806, https://ethics.ai/record/18806 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.