ToolHazard: Scaling Adversarial Environments for Security Evaluation and Alignment of LLM-based Agents
Large language model (LLM) agents integrated with external tools are vulnerable to indirect prompt injections embedded in environmental states. However, existing studies largely rely on manually implemented or reused environments, stochastic LLM-based tool simulation, and predefined injection locations, limiting scalable security research across broader domains. To bridge this gap, we propose **ToolHazard**, a scalable adversarial environment synthesis framework that reduces human engineering an
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: HuggingFace Daily Papers
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 13 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
REDAgentBench: Executable Red Teaming and Faithful Measurement of LLM Agent Systems
arXiv red teaming query · 11 August 2026
OpenART: Scaling Agent Red Teaming via Open-Ended Environment Evolution
arXiv red teaming query · 1 August 2026
OpenART: Scaling Agent Red Teaming via Open-Ended Environment Evolution
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 31 July 2026
STAR: Skeletal Token Alignment and Rearrangement for Interaction Recognition
arXiv · 19 July 2026
LLawCo: Learning Laws of Cooperation for Modeling Embodied Multi-Agent Behavior
arXiv · 26 June 2026
IDEA: Insensitive to Dynamics Mismatch via Effect Alignment for Sim-to-Real Transfer in Multi-Agent Control
arXiv · 25 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “ToolHazard: Scaling Adversarial Environments for Security Evaluation and Alignment of LLM-based Agents,” evidence record 18753, https://ethics.ai/record/18753 (originally published by HuggingFace Daily Papers).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.