Evidence record 18753 · automatically gathered

ToolHazard: Scaling Adversarial Environments for Security Evaluation and Alignment of LLM-based Agents

Large language model (LLM) agents integrated with external tools are vulnerable to indirect prompt injections embedded in environmental states. However, existing studies largely rely on manually implemented or reused environments, stochastic LLM-based tool simulation, and predefined injection locations, limiting scalable security research across broader domains. To bridge this gap, we propose **ToolHazard**, a scalable adversarial environment synthesis framework that reduces human engineering an

Record details

Published: 11 August 2026
Source: HuggingFace Daily Papers
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 13 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “ToolHazard: Scaling Adversarial Environments for Security Evaluation and Alignment of LLM-based Agents,” evidence record 18753, https://ethics.ai/record/18753 (originally published by HuggingFace Daily Papers).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.