Post-Calibration Reliability Reranking of Relevance Decisions via Label-wise Monotone Projection
Web search, product search, and question-answering retrieval systems often assign a relevance label and confidence score to each query-candidate pair. The relevance label describes how well a page, product, or passage matches the query, while the confidence often guides downstream use or fallback decisions. Post-hoc calibration is therefore needed because misaligned confidence can make systems over-trust wrong predictions or unnecessarily defer correct ones. However, calibration mainly aligns co
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.LG
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SafeCap: Improving LVLM Safety with Image Captioning Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Divided Attention Amplifies the Importance of Expectation-Aligned Visualization Design
arXiv cs.HC · 10 August 2026
UniMod: Enhancing Multi-Modal Medical Diagnosis through Cross-Modality and Within-Modality Alignment
arXiv cs.LG · 10 August 2026
Measuring Semantic Abstractness of SAE Features via Nonlocality
arXiv red teaming query · 11 August 2026
Pair-Centric Graph Rewiring for Over-Squashing via Optimal Transport-Guided Communication Alignment
arXiv cs.LG · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “Post-Calibration Reliability Reranking of Relevance Decisions via Label-wise Monotone Projection,” evidence record 18698, https://ethics.ai/record/18698 (originally published by arXiv cs.LG).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.