What We Know about Responsible AI Practices in Industry: A Half Decade of Empirical Research
Responsible AI (RAI) has become a central concern for technology companies, regulators, and the public. How industry practitioners interpret, implement, and sustain RAI work directly shapes the design and deployment of AI systems. As empirical scholarship examining RAI practices in industry has rapidly expanded, findings are dispersed across studies that focus on different roles, organizational contexts, and interventions. This work synthesizes current knowledge through a literature review of 16
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Threat-guided Policy-aware Scene Perturbation for Safe Autonomous Driving with Online Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · 11 August 2026
A Joint-Distribution Route to Fair Representations with Continuous Sensitive Attributes
arXiv fairness query · 11 August 2026
SafeCap: Improving LVLM Safety with Image Captioning Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Inferential Capability Does Not Determine Legal Scope
arXiv · 11 August 2026
IADD-TR: Intervention-Aware Dynamics Decoupling with Targeted Regularization for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
arXiv cs.LG · 11 August 2026
Longitudinal Evidence That General-Purpose Chatbots Actively Foster Relational Engagement
arXiv · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “What We Know about Responsible AI Practices in Industry: A Half Decade of Empirical Research,” evidence record 18428, https://ethics.ai/record/18428 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.