Longitudinal Evidence That General-Purpose Chatbots Actively Foster Relational Engagement
Social interaction has become one of the most common uses of LLMs, yet research on emotional bonds with AI has focused largely on how users experience these systems, leaving the systems' role in relationship formation poorly understood. Empirically establishing whether systems actively shape these bonds could blur the boundary between general-purpose AI and companions, affecting governance. In a pre-registered four-week longitudinal study (N = 72, 182,451 lines of conversation), participants con
Record details
Published: 11 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 12 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
IADD-TR: Intervention-Aware Dynamics Decoupling with Targeted Regularization for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
arXiv cs.LG · 11 August 2026
Inferential Capability Does Not Determine Legal Scope
arXiv · 11 August 2026
A Gateway Architecture for Enterprise MCP Authentication: Unifying Heterogeneous Auth, Identity Delegation, and the User / Non-User Persona Problem
arXiv · 11 August 2026
Reference-Free Post-Training of Open Large Language Models for Multilingual Machine Translation
arXiv cs.AI · 11 August 2026
SafeCap: Improving LVLM Safety with Image Captioning Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · 11 August 2026
A Joint-Distribution Route to Fair Representations with Continuous Sensitive Attributes
arXiv fairness query · 11 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 August 2026), “Longitudinal Evidence That General-Purpose Chatbots Actively Foster Relational Engagement,” evidence record 18419, https://ethics.ai/record/18419 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.