Walking through Discussions: A Mobile Visual Analytics System for In-Situ Group Discussion Analysis
Group discussion-based teaching is widely used to foster collaborative learning, yet teachers in physical classrooms often struggle to simultaneously monitor multiple groups and quickly diagnose a target group before intervening. Existing visual analytics tools primarily support post-hoc analysis on desktop, providing limited support for in-situ walk-around teaching. To address this gap, we present MobileGroupVis, a mobile visual analytics system for in-situ analysis of classroom group discussio
Record details
Published: 9 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Children & education
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving At-Risk Student Prediction in Health Professional Education: A Multi-Scenario Evaluation of FedAvg and FedProx
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 9 August 2026
Generative AI as a cognitive co-learner: a developmental framework for AI literacy in health sciences education
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 10 August 2026
Where Does AI Innovation Go? Measuring Research Attention Imbalance in AI Music
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
Social Media as a Driver of Obesity in Children and Adolescents (Aged 6-18 Years): It Is Time for Regulatory Action
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 10 August 2026
ResidencyRL: Reinforcement Learning in Simulated Clinical Environments
arXiv · 7 August 2026
Where Does AI Innovation Go? Measuring Research Attention Imbalance in AI Music
arXiv · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 August 2026), “Walking through Discussions: A Mobile Visual Analytics System for In-Situ Group Discussion Analysis,” evidence record 18290, https://ethics.ai/record/18290 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.