Explainable Statute Prediction via Attention-based Model and LLM Prompting
In this paper, we explore the problem of automatic statute prediction where for a given case description, a subset of relevant statutes are to be predicted. Here, the term statute refers to a section, a sub-section, or an article of any specific Act. Addressing this problem would be useful in several applications such as AI-assistant for lawyers and legal question answering system. For better user acceptance of such Legal AI systems, we believe the predictions should also be accompanied by human
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: Artificial Intelligence and Law
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Invisible to the Machine: Auditing AI Restaurant, Cafe, and Bar Recommendation Against a Complete Market Census
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
Against Explainable Artificial Intelligence In Law: Why Justifiable Ai Matters. A Credit Scoring Example
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
A^2E : An End-to-End Agent Auditing Engine
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 9 August 2026
SWE-Bench ProMax: Benchmarking Agents on Large-Scale Multilingual Code Refactoring
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 9 August 2026
SHRIMP: Iterative Refinement of Robot Task Plans
arXiv cs.HC · 9 August 2026
CIDER: A Dataset of Contextual Disclosure Boundaries for Privacy Preference Alignment
arXiv · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “Explainable Statute Prediction via Attention-based Model and LLM Prompting,” evidence record 18072, https://ethics.ai/record/18072 (originally published by Artificial Intelligence and Law).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.