A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents
Large language model-powered coding agents are increasingly used to modify existing code repositories, for example, by adding features or fixing bugs. Yet existing repository-level benchmarks typically evaluate only whether the final patch passes tests. Satisfying a user request requires a long chain of interdependent reasoning and decisions: an agent must recover explicit and implicit requirements, formulate a repository-grounded implementation plan, and translate it into correct code. A pass/f
Record details
Published: 10 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Diagnosing as Cardiologists Do: ECG Agents with Doctor-Grounded Priors for Clinical Reasoning Across Diseases and Populations
arXiv cs.LG · 10 August 2026
The Perils of Agency: How Developers Perceive, Prioritize, and Address Risks in Agentic AI Products
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
Same physical state, different collective dynamics: state encodings select synchronization outcomes in language-model agents
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
Agentic AI: User Empowerment or Enclosure?
arXiv cs.CY · 10 August 2026
PolicyKG: An Agentic LLM Pipeline for Translating Institutional Policies into SHACL Knowledge Graphs
arXiv · 10 August 2026
Context Is Not Authority: Structured Runtime Governance for Financial Market Agents
arXiv · 10 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 August 2026), “A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents,” evidence record 18031, https://ethics.ai/record/18031 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.