Multi-Agent Forensic Reasoning for Generalizable Deepfake Video Detection
The malicious use of generative artificial intelligence to create highly realistic deepfake videos raises serious ethical concerns and poses substantial challenges to AI safety. However, existing deepfake video benchmarks provide limited coverage of recent synthesis methods and generally lack reliable fine-grained textual annotations. Meanwhile, conventional detectors and multimodal large language models (MLLMs), whether operating as a single model or relying on a single analytical perspective,
Record details
Published: 6 August 2026
Source: HuggingFace Daily Papers
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Misinformation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 11 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Multi-Agent Forensic Reasoning for Generalizable Deepfake Video Detection
arXiv · 7 August 2026
From Cheap Fakes to Pure Synthesis: Addressing the New Era of T2V Fake News Videos
arXiv · 7 August 2026
MemOPD: On-Policy Distillation through Memory State Alignment for Long-Horizon Agents
arXiv · 7 August 2026
Governing Execution Risk in Agentic AI Systems: A Trajectory-Guided Framework for Red Teaming
arXiv cs.CY · 6 August 2026
Representation Handoffs for OpenArm-Based Laboratory Mobile Manipulation
arXiv · 7 August 2026
Agent Against Agent: An Agentic System for Automatic Prompt Injection Red Teaming
arXiv red teaming query · 5 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 August 2026), “Multi-Agent Forensic Reasoning for Generalizable Deepfake Video Detection,” evidence record 17980, https://ethics.ai/record/17980 (originally published by HuggingFace Daily Papers).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.