PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say
LLM-based agents are rapidly advancing, autonomously invoking external tools to complete multi-step tasks for users. However, agents often acquire more sensitive information than the task requires. Existing privacy benchmarks audit what the agent's response or outgoing actions disclose, but overlook the acquisition stage where data first enters the agent's context. The over-acquired information is then one careless action or one attack away from an outright leak. To assess its prevalence, we int
Record details
Published: 5 August 2026
Source: HuggingFace Daily Papers
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 10 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Accountable yet Anonymous AI Agents - Split-Knowledge Binding in National Agent-Identity Layer in China
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
It Takes Two: Complementary Self-Distillation for Contextual Integrity in LLMs
arXiv · 18 May 2026
Governing AI-Assisted Security Operations: A Design Science Framework for Operational Decision Support
arXiv · 10 May 2026
ADAPTS: Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms
arXiv · 4 May 2026
TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1
arXiv · 29 April 2026
VisualLeakBench: Auditing the Fragility of Large Vision-Language Models against PII Leakage and Social Engineering
arXiv · 11 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 August 2026), “PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say,” evidence record 17775, https://ethics.ai/record/17775 (originally published by HuggingFace Daily Papers).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.