Evidence record 17775 · automatically gathered

PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say

LLM-based agents are rapidly advancing, autonomously invoking external tools to complete multi-step tasks for users. However, agents often acquire more sensitive information than the task requires. Existing privacy benchmarks audit what the agent's response or outgoing actions disclose, but overlook the acquisition stage where data first enters the agent's context. The over-acquired information is then one careless action or one attack away from an outright leak. To assess its prevalence, we int

Record details

Published: 5 August 2026
Source: HuggingFace Daily Papers
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 10 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (5 August 2026), “PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say,” evidence record 17775, https://ethics.ai/record/17775 (originally published by HuggingFace Daily Papers).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.