Poli-Bias: Understanding and Measuring Large Language Model Biases in International Political Conflicts
Measuring political bias in large language models (LLMs) remains challenging as it can manifest through subtle differences in framing, argumentation, and legal reasoning that are difficult to capture with a single metric. In this work, we introduce Poli-Bias, a counterfactual framework for measuring whether LLMs treat legally equivalent conflict scenarios differently depending on the countries involved. Poli-Bias compares responses to paired prompts in which country identities are systematically
Record details
Published: 6 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 7 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
CogVis: Must Open-Vocabulary Change Detection Perceive the Scene Anew for Every Query?
arXiv cs.AI · 6 August 2026
Depth-Guided Video Object Counting in Crowded Scenes
arXiv cs.AI · 6 August 2026
Bias Analysis of L2 Speaking Assessment Systems Using Concept Activation Vectors
arXiv · 6 August 2026
Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data
arXiv cs.AI · 6 August 2026
Fairis: Fairness-Aware Aggregation with Provable Influence Containment against Fairness Poisoning Attacks in Collaborative Machine Learning
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 6 August 2026
Conditional Cognitive Biases in LLMs: How Biased User Turns Modulate In-Context Reasoning
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 August 2026), “Poli-Bias: Understanding and Measuring Large Language Model Biases in International Political Conflicts,” evidence record 17348, https://ethics.ai/record/17348 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.