Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data
This paper addresses the limitations of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) with respect to insufficient evaluation. They are illustrated through the DetoxAI image recognition system for bias detection and concept unlearning. Then, an example of a human-grounded evaluation of methods for explaining image classification is presented. The paper further explores methods for adapting explanations to evolving data streams with concept drift. Experiences with adapting counterfactuals for this pr
Record details
Published: 6 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Transparency
Retrieved: 7 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Manipulation-Proof Oblivious Audits against Deceptive Model Providers
arXiv · 5 August 2026
Who Should Be Generated? Justifying Demographic Targets in Open-Ended Generation
arXiv cs.CY · 4 August 2026
AIDLC–governance indicator framework: a lifecycle-based approach to institutional AI governance
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
Whose ethics? Whose AI? Refining the Philippine AI Regulation Act toward a Contextual AI Ethic
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
GoT-CD: Graph-of-Thoughts Causal Discovery and the Fragility of Post-hoc Path-Specific Fairness Audits
arXiv fairness query · 3 August 2026
Who Should Be Generated? Justifying Demographic Targets in Open-Ended Generation
arXiv · 3 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 August 2026), “Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data,” evidence record 17328, https://ethics.ai/record/17328 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.