Harrison.Rad 1.5 Technical Report: A radiology foundation model that can draft reports from images, priors and clinical context
Imaging demand is growing faster than the radiology workforce can expand, and reporting backlogs cannot be resolved through training and recruitment alone. The most direct opportunity is reducing the time and effort radiologists spend producing reports, a task that requires interpreting images, integrating clinical history and prior studies, and drafting structured findings. We present Harrison.Rad 1.5 (HR1.5), a radiology-specific multimodal large language model that accepts interleaved text an
Record details
Published: 7 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Alignment Plausibility: A New Standard for Assuring AI in Healthcare
arXiv · 8 July 2026
Copewell: A Multi-Agent Swarm Architecture for Equitable Mental Wellness Support
arXiv · 2 July 2026
A time-series classification framework for individual-level absenteeism prediction under severe class imbalance
arXiv · 30 June 2026
Coupled Tensor-Matrix Recovery via Proximal Alternating Linearized Minimization, with an Application to Workforce Skill and Small-Business Health Estimation
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Federal Cuts and Public Health: Social Media Sentiment Among Federal Employees
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 15 July 2026
Structural predictors and latent maturity regimes of robotic readiness in global health systems: evidence from machine learning-based latent clustering and class prediction
Frontiers in Robotics and AI · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 July 2026), “Harrison.Rad 1.5 Technical Report: A radiology foundation model that can draft reports from images, priors and clinical context,” evidence record 171, https://ethics.ai/record/171 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.