Copewell: A Multi-Agent Swarm Architecture for Equitable Mental Wellness Support
Mental health disorders affect nearly one billion people globally, yet 75% of individuals in low- and middle-income countries receive no treatment due to workforce shortages, cost barriers, and stigma. Current AI-powered wellness solutions predominantly rely on single-mode conversational interfaces that suffer high abandonment rates and fail to provide measurable, immediate relief calibrated to users' dynamic emotional states. This paper presents Copewell, a novel multi-agent swarm system design
Record details
Published: 2 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy · Healthcare · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Structural predictors and latent maturity regimes of robotic readiness in global health systems: evidence from machine learning-based latent clustering and class prediction
Frontiers in Robotics and AI · 16 July 2026
Medical robotics beyond automation: Human-robot collaboration and the RONNA system as a socio-technical case study
Technology in Society · 30 July 2026
Hidden Underbelly of the Silicon Valley: Algorithmic Exploitation and Health in Data Work Value Chains
arXiv cs.CY · 6 August 2026
Agent Manufacturing: Foundation-Model Agents as First-Class Industrial Entities
arXiv · 24 May 2026
From Replacement to Orchestration: A Socio-Technical Architecture for Agentic AI in Corporate R&D
arXiv · 23 May 2026
An Empirical Study of Agent Skills for Healthcare: Practice, Gaps, and Governance
arXiv · 4 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (2 July 2026), “Copewell: A Multi-Agent Swarm Architecture for Equitable Mental Wellness Support,” evidence record 310, https://ethics.ai/record/310 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.