Improving Interoperability among Defence and National Security Ontologies: Analysis and Evaluation Tasks
The use of ontologies and knowledge graphs is becoming increasingly widespread in the defence and national security domain. Numerous ontologies have been developed through initiatives led by academia, industry, and government. Achieving interoperability across diverse defence and national security ontologies remains a major challenge due to the domain's breadth and specialisation. In this work, we analyse and document over 60 publicly available ontologies and introduce a new track for the Ontolo
Record details
Published: 6 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Military & security
Retrieved: 7 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Toward Resilient Human-AI Collaboration: A Lifecycle Taxonomy of Sociotechnical Risks and Cascading Failures
arXiv cs.HC · 6 August 2026
War in the Abstract: The Rise and Consequences of Militarized Language in Scientific Communication
arXiv cs.CY · 6 August 2026
PromptShield Home: Ambient Multimodal Prompt Injection Defense for Smart-Home Agents
arXiv cs.HC · 6 August 2026
TRACE: A Multi-Layer Benchmark for Human AI Controller Coordination Under Drift and Failure
arXiv · 7 August 2026
The Nuclear Decision-Making Benchmark: Evaluating Frontier LLMs on Nuclear Tendencies
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
The Closing Window: How Governments Could Lose Their Ability to Restrain Advanced AI
arXiv cs.CY · 7 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 August 2026), “Improving Interoperability among Defence and National Security Ontologies: Analysis and Evaluation Tasks,” evidence record 17079, https://ethics.ai/record/17079 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.